Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael's avatar

Kash Patel, Emil Bove, Bondi... what can one say? Has ever an administration in our nation's history had such a cast of mendacious mediocrities? Texas politics are always baroque, never more so than under Abbott and that's saying something considering some of the doozies they've had as governor. Paxton's career has been emblematic of the total Texas experience. It would all make for a carnival house of horrors train ride if it weren't for the fact it is all in deadly seriousness.

Expand full comment
Lance Khrome's avatar

What Reuveni's various bits of internal communication re: Kilmar Abrego suggest is that the preferred audience is SCOTUS, not a rubber-stamping Senate Judiciary Committee, or the GOPer Senate, nor do they particularly concern only Bove's nomination. Rather, these communications clearly play to countless allegations of misrepresentation and callous disregard for truthful testimony throughout the dozens of court cases entered into by tRump's DOJ and DHS, and surely is the clearest indication that this regime has ZERO respect for ethical conduct when in a federal court *by design*, and that such conduct traduces the very nature of legal hearings. It's in fact the destruction of the "presumption of regularity" ethos, without which a court hearing loses its bonafides, end of.

In short, whenever the DOJ or SG files an "emergency" appeal against a federal judge's ruling, SCOTUS should assume in the first instance that the "appeal" is tainted, and that the "facts" as presented are the equivalent of "fuck you" to the lower-court judge and his/her decisions against this regime. THAT'S what should inform the Court's decision-making process, and nothing else.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?