Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Manqueman's avatar

Re Fortenberry: I suspect the reference to the investigation happening in LA means that it was done by the FBI’s LA office, something the Times failed to note referring only to investigators; my conclusion and theory of the case may be wrong. Alternatively: why would the US attorney be investigating a Nebraska rep regarding something that happened in DC? Fun fact: the local offices have too much independence yet are also too often ignored. That was happened with Clinton: NYC pressured Comey. And there’s 9/11 where an agent in the Midwest had reason to believe something funny was happening; the agent was correct but somehow the message failed to get where it needed to go.

All that said, I can completely wrong here, in whole or in part which, of course, wouldn’t be the first time for that.

Expand full comment
Victoria Brown's avatar

Thank you TPM/MM. Many of us appreciate all your coverage, including on the

Dictator wannabe and will continue to support FREE press initiatives.👍😲

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts