Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Manqueman's avatar

For those who missed and, for what good reason are curious, Times editor Joe Kahn was blessed with a New Yorker love fest/interview. Not going to provide the link but Roy Edroso riffed on it on his Substack thisAM. Only made it through one quote before it got too stressful but suffice to say the quote was 100% Fox News level lie.

As I’ve no doubt made clear enough IIRC, I see the mainstream news media as being literally harmful and has been such since at least the 2020 election cycle. And the Times is in no way an exception to that rule.indeed, it’s hitting new lows under the nepo baby’s nepo baby and Kahn.

Then again, my latest old fart theory is that as a collective, our leadership caste, private sector and the public sector they finance, are some form of sociopathic so, sure, of course, likewise mainstream news.

Meanwhile, an ask: I follow polls sort of randomly. I see a story, I check to see if there are any details regarding the mechanics of the polls, and then I assess it for fact-based value. Can its findings be trusted? If so, can the reporting be trusted?

So. If anyone has seen a poll they find insightful, please forward a link. So far, I’m only seeing stuff that says, given the margins of error, no one does particularly better than Biden. May well be because the election’s pretty going to be Trump or Anyone But Trump.

And something of a correction to David’s inference: nothing but will is in anyway impeding blanket coverage of Project 2025 and what Trump 2.0 (possibly after J6 2.0) will bring.

Expand full comment
Denise Woodbury's avatar

It seems to me, that whining about Biden without giving a firm alternative, is advocating for Trump. Well?

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts