Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Judith Taylor's avatar

Re the Colorado case. I thought "Stewart" was the only claim to standing that the plaintiffs had. So why doesn't the revelation that he isn't gay and hadn't wanted a wedding website eliminate the plaintiff's right to sue and therefore provide grounds for a rehearing? Adam Liptak didn't address this. JT

Expand full comment
BM77's avatar

Hate speech is not “free” speech.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts