11 Comments
User's avatar
LittleBongo's avatar

Thanks for the read-out. Sorry I can’t pay—just an informed senior out here with my SS check on the line. I can’t think straight since the story of the dead not dead man in Seattle had his benefits and Medicare stopped. Not only stopped, but some payments CLAWED back from his bank account! I appreciate your work. Out here riveted on the details of this compressed fascistic couple of months—I’ve been worried about tax/wealth inequality/attack on govt since Reagan won in 1980! It’s been a long-ass well-planned assault.

Expand full comment
Liberal Old Lady's avatar

It’s so ironic to think that if Biden or Obama had acted towards the Courts like this, the Republicans would already have Articles of Impeachment drawn up & a trial date set.

Expand full comment
Al Bellenchia's avatar

I am struggling to believe that the Roberts message portends any real teeth coming from this compromised court.

Expand full comment
Richard House's avatar

You came close, but, in the end spared us the beltway standard crutch line of “John Roberts is an institutionalist” horseshit. While Trump is Grifter-in-Chief, Roberts, Thomas and Alito are senior grifters and they aren’t going to surrender that status to anyone. They, as much as anyone created, enabled and saved Trump and he even thanked Roberts last week via open mike. But, threats to their empowered domain won’t be tolerated.

Expand full comment
Lance Khrome's avatar

"But we need to see appeals courts and the high court itself weighing in on the substance of these cases *in the weeks and months to come* before we can assess whether the judicial branch will hold the line."

...in the weeks and months to come...ah, but you see, there's the rub. Elno, tRump, Vaughn, Homan, et al can continue their rampage through our government and our Constitution, creating irremediable damages along the way, dodging and prevaricating in spite of TROs and injunctions, until at some point well into the future, they MAY be ordered to cease and desist by SCOTUS, but in the meantime the damage has been done, and the consequences irreversible...which after all was and is the point of "flooding the zone".

Expand full comment
Linda Marple's avatar

flooding the zone has resulted in poor preparation for court to our benefit having an unelected bureaucrat billionaire musk running things hasn't helped Pino either

Expand full comment
Manqueman's avatar

So those court orders adverse to Trump: how’s the compliance going and are appeals being filed with stays requested?

I keep seeing stuff about orders but little about what happens next.

I know a lot of the problem there is me missing things but what am I missing exactly?

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Indeed the Constitution has, and will, continue to treat the scoundrel very unfairly in the asset's eyes. That's why the cultists are contemplating calling a constitutional convention.

Expand full comment
JJ's avatar

I just struggle to understand why it matters. The executive branch is the one in charge of enforcing court decisions. Trump, as the head of the executive branch, will just ignore the court decisions. The system never made any sense, but at least it worked so long as the people in the White House cared about the Constitution and about fulfilling their Constitutional role. The second we got someone in there who doesn’t care about those things, the whole thing falls apart. Every court in the country can rule against Trump; I see absolutely no mechanism through which that stops him, even a little bit.

Expand full comment
Victoria Brown's avatar

King George thought the

same thing, until 'the

people' in that far away

country said ENOUGH!

Expand full comment
Linda Marple's avatar

isn't there something about civil cases he's not in charge of.. maybe things brought by States I don't know either

Expand full comment