Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kim's avatar

1. Re: WSJ article, disdain is not the same as hate. After all, we have Hate Crmes not Disdain Crimes. 2. Maybe, just maybe, if Trump wants to run for president and, in the process, ruin other people's lives with violent and false rhetoric, he shouldn't be going out in public. I object to my taxpayer dollars going towards protecting this evil man from danger, especially when he and his ilk care not one whit for protecting my beautiful granddaughter going to school, or my children going to concerts or my friend going to church. 3. See part 2 of number 2. 4. The only reason I care about the shooting is that unfortunately it has drawn attention away from the fact that Trump is failing, ever more, cognitively and morally. 5. in the Good Catch section, he also referred to the police and non-protesters as "the other side." 6. I had to Wiki the "Bourbon'" definition and guess what? The "Bourbons" didn't call themselves that. It was a critical term used by people that were against them. "During Reconstruction, the term "Bourbon" would have had the connotation of a retrogressive, reactionary dynasty out of step with the modern world." Does JD Vance even know that? or does he just think it sounds like an elegant term for racist?

Expand full comment
Runfastandwin's avatar

FFS it's obvious what's going on with tangeranus and Loomer.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts