Discussion about this post

User's avatar
E. A. Bare's avatar

Alito is having a great time giving two middle fingers to the American people, congress and the constitution. He doesn't care because he can't be touched. "I wont recuse what are you going to do about it. He is a disgrace to the court, to the judiciary and to America and he laughs about it every day as he plots what will happen when he helps to make sure t***p is back in the WH. Oh how delicious it will be to him to stomp down all these foolish, women and minorities that think they have rights.

Expand full comment
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

Thursday 3:00 PM Eastern: Chief Justice ROBERTS just wrote a letter in the last hour refusing to meet with Senators Whitehouse & Durbin to discuss ethical COI's, conflicts (plural) of interest.

Meanwhile, JAMIE RASKIN posted a recusal pathway on the NYT platform. The pathway is outlined by TARA SUTER , a reporter at "The Hill" on 5/29/25 9:00 PM Eastern quoting JAMIE RASKIN verbatim:

"The U.S. Department of Justice --- including:

" ... the U.S. Attorney, [USAOC DC]

an appointed U.S. Special Counsel, [Special Counsel federal statute]

" and the solicitor General [ of the United States]

" ... all of whom were involved in different ways in the criminal prosecution underlying these cases and are opposing Mr. Trump's constitutional & statutory claims -- can petition of the remaining seven (7 )justices to require Justices ALITO & THOMAS to recuse themselves in cases NOT as a matter of grace but, as a matter of law."

Relying among other law, RASKIN cited the Due Process clause of the Constitution and the federal statute mandating DQ for questionable impartiality, 28 U.S.C , 455.

I would add the legal maxims for every wrong there is a remedy & fundamental fairness.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts