9 Comments
Aug 10, 2023Liked by David Kurtz

Just wondering: Are posts on the old “Twitter” now called x-rays?

Expand full comment
Aug 10, 2023Liked by David Kurtz

That Trump wants his own SCIF is the ultimate irony given his flaunting of propriety that necessitates the need to begin with.

"Lookie what I have!!"

Expand full comment

David, thank you greatly for your precision on each factual comment.👏

Expand full comment
Aug 10, 2023Liked by David Kurtz

Was a time we were pretty comfortable with "the artist formerly known as Prince" ... what's wrong with "FKA Twitter? "

Expand full comment

There is something very odd going on in American courts...See the following story from the Washington Post: A Trump judge sends Southwest Airlines lawyers to right-wing reeducation camp:

https://wapo.st/3QDKVFv

Expand full comment

Mr Craig Robertson was certainly a sick, angry, hate-filled creature, wasn't he? Rather too vivid & graphic imaginings, too. No doubt he got heated up to the boiling point and kept on simmer by Fox, Breitbart, OAN, NewsMax and every 4CHAN, X and Truth Social type media, as well. He was practically BEGGING to be taken out--almost as though he was daring them because he didn't really believe they would?

Expand full comment

Guy sure does have a lot of friends!

Expand full comment

Grift (Thomas) and SCIF (Trump) have a near phonetic chime. Ding! 2 pees in a pod.

Expand full comment

“If Cannon were to indulge this nonsense, I suspect this would be the first of what could be many pre-trial issues that Special Counsel Jack Smith would take to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals for relief.”

Again, something of a primer/prediction:

Cannon will at least be enabling Trump’s game of delay (which, as I’ve noted, can likely blow up in his ugly face). Obviously, whatever crap she pulls gets appealed to the 11th circuit. Depending on how they decided, there may be reconsideration by all the judges at CA11. After that, specially if the decision is adverse to Trump (likely!), there’ll be an attempt to get SCOTUS involved. If past/prologue, they’ll disappoint Trump as they regularly have. (Unlike elected Republican politicians, SCOTGOP has no need for Trump. They’ve done far more to implement Republican goals than Trump and a GOP majority in Congress ever have.)

And that is why I’m certain there be no final resolution of the federal cases before the election. Meanwhile, the NY criminal case is so minor, an acquittal wouldn’t matter to any great degree. As for GA: waiting on Fani. Still.

Expand full comment