Bravo…as Elmo continues to destroy twitter, here you are bringing me the news I find most relevant, newsworthy. As the whiners in media have complained about Garland taking too long to indict Trump, I believe that by prosecuting his rioters early, he’ll have less mob to incite violence when he does get indicted. Looking at you Leonnig and McCaskill
Serious question: Couldn't it be construed as an act of criminal conduct for a sitting official to use his office to attempt to alter the outcome of an election?
One possibility would be an 18 USC 241 conspiracy to deprive rights, but the devil is in the details. I don't know enough specifics about the conversation and other related conduct to make a firm assessment.
Love it when you are quoted in “Letters from an American”!
Bravo…as Elmo continues to destroy twitter, here you are bringing me the news I find most relevant, newsworthy. As the whiners in media have complained about Garland taking too long to indict Trump, I believe that by prosecuting his rioters early, he’ll have less mob to incite violence when he does get indicted. Looking at you Leonnig and McCaskill
Try that in a small town is just the latest chickenhawk attempt to try to be an edge lord just like courtesy of the red white and blue was about 9/11.
In Indictment Watch: good for Joyce Vance for seeing this as a possibility:
Joyce Alene y
@JoyceWhiteVance
As a friend with a far better memory than (I) just pointed out, this Tweet aged pretty well. And, it was pre-Jan 6.
© Save Kyle Griffin © @kylegriffint • Dec 5, 2020
Serious question: Couldn't it be construed as an act of criminal conduct for a sitting official to use his office to attempt to alter the outcome of an election?
• 1,203
t7 5,004
© 29.2K
Joyce Alene ©
@JoyceWhiteVance
One possibility would be an 18 USC 241 conspiracy to deprive rights, but the devil is in the details. I don't know enough specifics about the conversation and other related conduct to make a firm assessment.
4:13 PM • Dec 5, 2020