Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary's avatar

Thanks Sarah.

Lance Khrome's avatar

Although the Supremes upheld birthright citizenship in today's decision, three Justices dissented, including Clarence "Three-fifths" Thomas...and even Kavanaugh dissented on the constitutional question, but concurred on the federal-statutes grounds.

Bloody hell, did those three-and-a-half people actually READ the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause? Could its language be even more plain? What's to argue about? Almost hesitant to read the dissents re: driving my hypertension even higher.

No posts

Ready for more?