Although the Supremes upheld birthright citizenship in today's decision, three Justices dissented, including Clarence "Three-fifths" Thomas...and even Kavanaugh dissented on the constitutional question, but concurred on the federal-statutes grounds.
Bloody hell, did those three-and-a-half people actually READ the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause? Could its language be even more plain? What's to argue about? Almost hesitant to read the dissents re: driving my hypertension even higher.
The funny/not funny thing about that mail in vote decision *and maybe even the reason behind it* is that it probably helps Republican voters more than Democrat voters.
In any case, finding any other way is just too stupid for the Roberts junta.
And this is a perfect reason why I think MAGAts are dumber than bricks.
Thanks Sarah.
Although the Supremes upheld birthright citizenship in today's decision, three Justices dissented, including Clarence "Three-fifths" Thomas...and even Kavanaugh dissented on the constitutional question, but concurred on the federal-statutes grounds.
Bloody hell, did those three-and-a-half people actually READ the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause? Could its language be even more plain? What's to argue about? Almost hesitant to read the dissents re: driving my hypertension even higher.
The funny/not funny thing about that mail in vote decision *and maybe even the reason behind it* is that it probably helps Republican voters more than Democrat voters.
In any case, finding any other way is just too stupid for the Roberts junta.
And this is a perfect reason why I think MAGAts are dumber than bricks.