This type of reporting is terrible. It's a "Gotcha moment", in which Matt's question is never debunked... with the source in question, questioned. That doesn't mean he was wrong in asking. This exchange simply avoids answering. Shouldn't this be an easy answer? And the reporting never answers the question either, just points out how "wrong" he was... well I expect a clear, concise answer as to WHY he was wrong, not just pointing out his source is biased. ALL media is biased these days... so explain WHY, not just WHO. WHO answers nothing, just implies and assumes. Terrible reporting.
Excellent summary of relevant news, allowing me to spend way less time on the bird app
This type of reporting is terrible. It's a "Gotcha moment", in which Matt's question is never debunked... with the source in question, questioned. That doesn't mean he was wrong in asking. This exchange simply avoids answering. Shouldn't this be an easy answer? And the reporting never answers the question either, just points out how "wrong" he was... well I expect a clear, concise answer as to WHY he was wrong, not just pointing out his source is biased. ALL media is biased these days... so explain WHY, not just WHO. WHO answers nothing, just implies and assumes. Terrible reporting.