The over-educated, under-intelligent, otherwise-unemployables at the WaPo, NYT and CNN are desperate to keep Trump as a "normal" candidate so people will believe the horse hockey of their "horse race" coverage of the 2024 campaign. They're doing the same thing now that Jeff Zucker-the-Fucker (as he is well-known in Hollywood) did in 2016 when it was pointed out that his non-stop free coverage of Trump's Nuremberg Rallies were an "in-kind donation" to his campaign, and ZtF replied, "Donald Trump is great for ratings!"
Not surprised to see Maggie the Habes' byline on the NYT piece, since it follows her usual M.O. of simply reprinting whatever line Trumpworld is spoonfeeding her. Remember her claim that Trump "just likes collecting tchotchkes" in the MAL documents case?
I really wish someone would ask Barr if his super secret Operation Legend had anything to do with suppression of minority voters, the 4th count in the J6 indictment. Collins chuckling at his response to whether or not he’s spoken to DOJ was as gross as when she lacked follow up when POTUS said he didn’t know if there would be a Republican Party in 2024. Amateur.
Why am I not surprised that Eric Schmidt and Maggie Habberman wrote the bothsides section of the article in the NYT? Many will not read as far the sensible discussion in the latter part.
Okay, bad me. It's Michael not Eric. Also, once I saw the bylines, I didn't read the article. Maggie's one of the worst, but Schmidt is not what I'd call one of the best.
When a bank robber tells the teller to hand over all the cash, he's just exercising his First Amendment rights.
The over-educated, under-intelligent, otherwise-unemployables at the WaPo, NYT and CNN are desperate to keep Trump as a "normal" candidate so people will believe the horse hockey of their "horse race" coverage of the 2024 campaign. They're doing the same thing now that Jeff Zucker-the-Fucker (as he is well-known in Hollywood) did in 2016 when it was pointed out that his non-stop free coverage of Trump's Nuremberg Rallies were an "in-kind donation" to his campaign, and ZtF replied, "Donald Trump is great for ratings!"
Not surprised to see Maggie the Habes' byline on the NYT piece, since it follows her usual M.O. of simply reprinting whatever line Trumpworld is spoonfeeding her. Remember her claim that Trump "just likes collecting tchotchkes" in the MAL documents case?
When exercising your First Amendment rights to cause
harm, fraud and other egregious distilled ramblings
of the TRUTH, you are also
"bearing false witness". This,
in a higher realm, has no
work around DJT, NYT, WSJ and all these other dips flapping their cracked lips.
I really wish someone would ask Barr if his super secret Operation Legend had anything to do with suppression of minority voters, the 4th count in the J6 indictment. Collins chuckling at his response to whether or not he’s spoken to DOJ was as gross as when she lacked follow up when POTUS said he didn’t know if there would be a Republican Party in 2024. Amateur.
Why am I not surprised that Eric Schmidt and Maggie Habberman wrote the bothsides section of the article in the NYT? Many will not read as far the sensible discussion in the latter part.
Maggie that Hab wrote the top half and Schmidt wrote the bottom half.
Okay, bad me. It's Michael not Eric. Also, once I saw the bylines, I didn't read the article. Maggie's one of the worst, but Schmidt is not what I'd call one of the best.