Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lance Khrome's avatar

So, Paul Clements is concerned about "separation of powers" issues in advising Fed Judge Ho on the Adams case. Has he not gotten the memo yet that the tRump regime has virtually eliminated any and all "separation of powers" walls, and remains adamant in promoting the all-powerful "unitary executive" who recognizes NO impediment to act, constitutional doctrines be damned?

Expand full comment
Manqueman's avatar

Periodic reminder that we chose this.

Anyone, albeit more so our elite and leadership class, who didn’t see this coming… No excuse after his last term, J6, and after. None.

To be clear, I keep harping on this because I’m amazed like 24/7 that a society could be so stupid, deranged, sociopathic and/or infantile to freely elect (or allow to be elected as the case maybe) a completely unfit POS. (I give a limited pass because there were numerous pressures to do so, none of which included forcing anyone to vote for choice. For all intents and purposes, every vote or decision not to vote was freely made.)

Now that I wrote that last ‘graf, I’m getting amazed all over again.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts